BIS Titration SimulatOR Download

Simulator Manual:
Please note: There is an easy to follow online user tutorial included with the SimulatOR software (above). However, if you would prefer a PDF of the User Instruction Guide, click here to download.
To Install the Program:
- Download the zipped file
- Using Windows Explorer, go the location on the computer where the file was saved
- Extract files from the zipped file
- Double-click on Setup.exe and follow the instructions on the screen
To Run the Program:
Upon a successful installation, there will be a shortcut placed on your Desktop and
under the Start Menu for BIS Titration SimulatOR.
- Double-click on the BIS Titration SimulatOR shortcut icon on the Desktop
OR
- Go to Start Menu -> All Programs -> BIS Education -> BIS Titration SimulatOR
About The BIS Titration SimulatOR Experience:
The BIS Titration SimulatOR was developed as a creative learning exercise for anesthesia professionals to explore BIS-guided anesthesia titration during an animated simulation of surgery procedure. The simulator assumes that the user has basic knowledge regarding BIS monitoring.
For each patient, the user has the option of conducting the simulated anesthetic using either a volatile gas, TIVA, or TIVA-TCI technique. Regardless of technique, for a given scenario the user manages induction, intubation, ventilation, and fluids in addition to drug selection and titration. In conditions of inadequate anesthesia, analgesia, or muscle relaxant effect, surgical stimulation and pain thresholds determine patient somatic response and/or surgeon comments.
The data presented in the patient scenarios were derived from computer model simulations that were guided by published literature. For each scenario option, patient simulation software (“Body Simulation for Anesthesia” (BODY) [1]) was used to create data for displaying numeric values and trends on the OR monitors (i.e., cardiovascular and other physiological parameters.) In addition, BODY calculated predicted volatile agent concentrations and predicted blood concentrations of intravenous agents, as well as the pharmacodynamic effects and interactions among the anesthetic agents on the cardiovascular, respiratory, and neuroendocrine systems in the simulated patient [2],[3]. Of note, BODY incorporates patient age, weight and co-morbidity in the modeled response
Anesthetic effect was calculated by estimating both net analgesic level and net hypnotic level, from drug interaction models [4],[5],[6] and Aspect’s extensive clinical database [7]. Mean BIS values were calculated from the net hypnotic level. The time variation of BIS trends stems was modulated by the predicted analgesic level [8]. Intensity of noxious stimulation (e.g., laryngoscopy, skin incision, abdominal surgery) was estimated using the relative anesthetic requirement to prevent movement response to each stimulation [9]. The rise in BIS, EMG and cardiovascular parameters with intraoperative stimulation was modeled from published studies and Aspect’s clinical database. The train-of-four response was estimated from the predicted concentrations of muscle relaxant [10]. The simulated response to “perceived” stimulation (i.e., pain) from intraoperative events was created by infusing epinephrine to achieve a hemodynamic response as guided by the literature [11]. The train-of-four level was estimated from the predicted concentrations of muscle relaxant [12]. Patient recovery times from cessation of volatile agent were extrapolated from published studies on recovery from BIS guided anesthesia care [13],[14]. TCI pharmacokinetics of remifentanil are based on the Minto model while the Schneider model is used for propofol infusion [15],[16].
The integrated simulation environment (vaporizers, syringes, infusion devices, simulated patient monitors) as well as animations used in the simulator were created by Moberg Multimedia.
References
[1]Smith T, Starko K. Body Simulation for Anesthesia, Advanced Simulation Corporation, www.advsim.com.
[2] Greco WR, Bravo G, Parsons JC. The Search for Synergy: A Critical Review from a Response Surface Perspective. Pharmacological Reviews 1995; 47:181-234.
[3] Smith NT. Dangers and Opportunities, in Drug Interactions in Anesthesia, Smith NT, Corbascio AN, Eds., Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1987, pp. 1-11.
[4] Stanski R. Chapter 29: Monitoring Depth of Anesthesia in Anesthesia 5th Edition Miller R, ed. ,Churchill Livingstone, New York, 2000, pp. 1087-1116.
[5] Glass PS, Bloom M, Kearse L, Rosow C, Sebel P, Manberg P. Bispectral Analysis Measures Sedation and Memory Effects of Propofol, Midazolam, Isoflurane, and Alfentanil in Healthy Volunteers. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 836-847.
[6] Katoh T, Suzuki A, Ikeda K. Electroencephalographic Derivatives as a Tool for Predicting the Depth of Sedation and Anesthesia Induced by Sevoflurane. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 642-650.
[7] Glass P, Sebel P, Greenwald S, Chamoun N. Quantification of the Relative Effects of Anesthetic Agents on the EEG and Patient Responsiveness to Incision. Anesthesiology 1994; 8: A407.
[8] Bloom MJ, Greenwald S, Day R. Analgesics Decrease Arousal Response to Stimulation as Measured by Changes in Bispectral Index (BIS). Anesthesiology 1996; 85: A481.
[9] Anesthesia, 6th Edition. Edited by Ronald D. Miller, M.D. Philadelphia, Elsevier, Churchill, Livingstone, 2005., pp 1232, 1242.
[10] Anesthesia, 6th Edition. Edited by Ronald D. Miller, M.D. Philadelphia, Elsevier, Churchill, Livingstone, 2005., Table 13-6, page 500.
[11] Gan TJ, et al. Bispectral Index Monitoring Allows Faster Emergence and Improved Recovery from Propofol, Alfentanil and Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 808-815.
[12] Anesthesia, 6th Edition. Edited by Ronald D. Miller, M.D. Philadelphia, Elsevier, Churchill, Livingstone, 2005., Table 13-6, page 500.
[13] Song D, Joshi G, White PF. Titration of Volatile Anesthetics Using Bispectral Index Facilitates Recovery after Ambulatory Anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 842-848.
[14] Wong J, Song D, Blanshard H, et al. Titration of Isoflurane Using BIS Index Improves Recovery of Elderly Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgeries. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2002; 49: 13-18.
[15] Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD, Youngs E, Lemmens HJM, Gambus PL, Billard V, Hoke JF, Moore KHP, Hermann DJ, Muir KT, Mandema JW, Shafer SL: Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development. Anesthesiology 1997; 86:10-23.
[16] Schnider TW, Minto CF, Gambus P, et al. The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers. Anesthesiology (1998) 88:1170–82
Minimum System Requirements:
To use this program, your computer must meet or exceed the following requirements:
- Processor: Pentium 4 CPU 2.4 GHz
- Operating System: Windows XP/Vista (32-bit)
- Administrator Privileges
- Memory/RAM: Windows XP - 512 MB, Windows Vista - 2 GB
- Free Hard Disk Space: 50 MB
- Color Display Resolution: 1024 x 768
- Sound capabilities and speakers or headset
|